3:50am February 5, 2012

“Discussions of ‘special educational needs’ (SEN), 'children with SEN’ and 'inclusion’ continue to portray disabled learners as problematic 'others’ to be tolerated and managed (Allan 2004). The neo-liberal prioritisation of entrepreneurship and autonomy create further problems for disabled learners attempting to negotiate an increasingly market-driven education system. This paper comes about as a result of eight-weeks spent as a volunteer in an organisation offering self-advocacy based projects to young people with the label of 'learning difficulties’, and considers such projects alongside Deleuzoguatarrian Disability Studies discussions of socially just pedagogy. By drawing on Deleuze and Guattari’s metaphor of the rhizome, and considering desire as productive, it is argued that such projects have the potential to offer an alternative, more engaged and socially-just education to the one currently offered in schools.”

Jenny Slater, “Self-Advocacy and Socially Just Pedagogy”

I can’t read a word of this. And this is just the abstract. The article is just as bad. What makes this worse is that it’s an article about people with cognitive impairments of types that generally make this kind of thing really hard to read. And I suspect this is even hard to read for any random nondisabled person too. As a person with bad receptive language it makes my brain go “…….. ….. .. ……. um……… wibble?!?” There’s just something very wrong going on here.

3 notes