Theme
2:10am July 30, 2014

alliecat-person:

With all of this Myers-Briggs stuff going around Tumblr lately, I’m wondering if I’m the only one who isn’t sure about my type. I’m very sure on the I and fairly sure on the J, but the other two are confusing. I used to think I was N, but now I’m not so sure. And heaven knows the T/F distinction trips me up.

And yes, I have taken the online tests, and gotten practically everything under the sun, though always with I and usually with J.

If I had to take a gander at just one type I’d probably say INTJ, but I’m not entirely sure. Or maybe I’m just resisting being the most popular type among sociopaths?

You’re not the only person.

I’ve tested as pretty much everything with an I and a P in it.

I usually just say ISFP because that’s what I most recently and consistently test as, but I’ve also tested as ISTP, INTP, and INFP.  And occasionally something with a J in it, but that’s rare.

I don’t think it’s that meaningful anyway.  It relies on false dichotomies for pretty much everything.  

I particularly don’t like N vs. S, especially because I feel like, if you’re going to put N on one side, and S on another side, I would be another letter, as far past S as S is past N.  N and S look, to me, just like two different levels of the same basic kind of thinking, and my own kind of thinking is not even represented.

And F vs. T – those aren’t opposites at all.  Not in their colloquial meanings, and not in the specialized meanings of the MBTI either.  I’ve actually spent quite a lot of time studying the MBTI, so I’m not just throwing these ideas out there without understanding them.

People who do believe in this stuff seem to believe that these things are “obvious” and obviously real.  I don’t get it.

I also don’t like the complex way that they’ve come up with, over the years, to explain what happens when someone actually has traits that are from outside their type.  And they have come up with plenty of ways to explain that.  Of course.

Anyway, I’m not “sure of my type” at all, I don’t think I have a type (or that anyone does).  I just write ISFP because it’s the last one I consistently tested as and I’m sick of taking the test, it no longer holds even morbid fascination the way it used to.

Notes:
  1. greatdarkone reblogged this from walkingsaladshooterfromheaven
  2. sonatagreen reblogged this from madeofpatterns and added:
    I hate personality tests. Even if I do happen to fit into your boxes, the presumption that I necessarily – or even...
  3. feathercoatrenegade reblogged this from walkingsaladshooterfromheaven and added:
    This, though! I’d been wondering how T and F were supposed to be opposites and thought it was just me. I make decisions...
  4. walkingsaladshooterfromheaven reblogged this from withasmoothroundstone and added:
    I agree. I am both highly T and highly F, extremely logical/analytical and extremely gut/feelings-based - they are...
  5. withasmoothroundstone reblogged this from neurodiversitysci and added:
    I have a really hard time with N vs. S. To me, N is just a more complex form of S. And if you had to put things on a...
  6. nekomanko reblogged this from neurodiversitysci
  7. neurodiversitysci reblogged this from madeofpatterns and added:
    It’s not a scientific test, at all. It’s neither reliable (meaning the same person gets the same result consistently if...
  8. madeofpatterns reblogged this from withasmoothroundstone and added:
    That test makes me angry because of how stupid it is. And because I went to a school that made us take it over and over.
  9. deer-kin reblogged this from withasmoothroundstone and added:
    This is so well written I always get different results
  10. worldwithinworld said: Tests I took years ago said I was INTJ, but lately I’ve been thinking I’m really INTP.
  11. karalianne said: I’m an I but the rest change depending on the day.
  12. ajax-daughter-of-telamon said: I can think of a couple of other people who get a ton of different types, so no, it’s not just you.
  13. alliecat-person posted this