Theme
5:13pm August 24, 2014

“Settler colonialism is different from other forms of colonialism in that settlers come with the intention of making a new home on the land, a homemaking that insists on settler sovereignty over all things in their new domain. Thus, relying solely on postcolonial literatures or theories of coloniality that ignore settler colonialism will not help to envision the shape that decolonization must take in settler colonial contexts. Within settler colonialism, the most important concern is land/ water/air/ subterranean earth (land, for shorthand, in this article.) Land is what is most valuable, contested, required. This is both because the settlers make Indigenous land their new home and source of capital, and also because the disruption of Indigenous relationships to land represents a profound epistemic, ontological, cosmological violence. This violence is not temporally contained in the arrival of the settler but is reasserted each day of occupation. This is why Patrick Wolfe (1999) emphasizes that settler colonialism is a structure and not an event. In the process of settler colonialism, land is remade into property and human relationships to land are restricted to the relationship of the owner to his property. Epistemological, ontological, and cosmological relationships to land are interred, indeed made pre-modern and backward. Made savage.”

— Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang, Decolonization is not a metaphor (via mahakavi)
Notes:
  1. meridok reblogged this from clatterbane
  2. artifactrix reblogged this from withasmoothroundstone
  3. marchcouldbedarker reblogged this from clatterbane
  4. withasmoothroundstone reblogged this from clatterbane
  5. clatterbane reblogged this from ajax-daughter-of-telamon
  6. queernuck reblogged this from redd-wolf
  7. ajax-daughter-of-telamon reblogged this from mahakavi
  8. redd-wolf reblogged this from mahakavi
  9. mahakavi posted this